Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '18 at 15:27
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 126 2-Core 248 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 672 72% 571 Pts	64-Core 680 42% 680 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 10C1) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Lighting 33.9 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 31.1 28% 30.2 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 33.5 Splatting 23 24% 31 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 209 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 683GB free (System drive) Firmware: V6005-af Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 455 461 476 479 233 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 542 Write 387 Mixed 279 SusWrite 412 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 30.1 106% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 46.1 DQ Mixed 49.1 60% 110 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 158%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 358GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 65 88 88 93 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 17.5 Write 2 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 85.5 28% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.4 439% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 23.6 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 36.1 SC Mixed 26.4 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,693x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	921x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,556x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,057x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	324x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	120x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	109x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	875x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	220x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16