HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '18 at 20:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44% Average
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 134
50% 104 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 229
31% 228 Pts
64-Core 224
15% 224 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 838F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4771
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 20.7
5% 22.3 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 32.2
5% 23.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 838F) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 30.7
9% 31.7 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 15.9
11% 28.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 28%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2120G 120GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 134 132 116 117 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 313
Write 171
Mixed 185
SusWrite 124
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 23.4
84% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 132
79% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 88%
Kingston SHFR200480G 480GB
218GB free
Firmware: 000056R8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 195 195 166 169 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 372
Write 343
Mixed 349
SusWrite 201
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 32.1
107% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 38.8
88% 180 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 53%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 9,082 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback