PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-D3P (all builds) |
Memory | 8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130524 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 08 '18 at 18:47 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
84.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 297 238 227 233 250 MB/s
|
66.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
909GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 133 135 135 133 134 MB/s
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
529GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 68 68 67 67 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
1.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 119 110 117 121 MB/s
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
|
40.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 196x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 162x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 117x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 41x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $392 |