Asus MAXIMUS IX APEX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX APEX  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '18 at 20:18
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 99.3
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
105% 192 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 878
92% 740 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 106%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36DD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1652 MHz, MLim: 2006 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.64
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 127
Parallax 114
101% 122 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 111
Splatting 92.7
84% 104 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2120G 120GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 135 120 117 113 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 519
Write 197
Mixed 235
SusWrite 124
59% 269 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 40.3
166% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 45.9
DQ Mixed 134
110% 165 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 89%
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
39GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 173 129 123 117 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 445
Write 266
Mixed 305
SusWrite 151
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 41.1
165% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 179
163% 249 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
92GB free
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 437 450 452 452 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 450
Mixed 231
SusWrite 441
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 39.8
170% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 126
133% 223 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 110%
Great: 99%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
50GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,052
Write 1,789
Mixed 817
343% 1,553 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 66.2
278% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 1373
DQ Mixed 1,046
832% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
428GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 119
Write 111
Mixed 81
SusWrite 83.1
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
305GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 82.5
Write 87.2
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 83.7
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4133 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 36.4
133% 46.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 53.5
SC Mixed 38.3
114% 39.9 GB/s
Latency 39.1
102% 39.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 132%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX APEX Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $803
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback