HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8307
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180614
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '18 at 18:03
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	90%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 82.1 2-Core 143 56% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 204 25% 192 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.8% Very good	Lighting 92 Reflection 95.3 Parallax 97.2 75% 94.8 fps	MRender 82 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 84.8 66% 79.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65 11,104 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 237 204 165 98 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 513 Write 376 Mixed 360 SusWrite 187 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 21.1 80% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 415 DQ Mixed 302 240% 329 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 462GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 118 115 108 102 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 125 Write 110 Mixed 68.6 SusWrite 112 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 20.5 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	511x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	218x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	216x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	324x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	229x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	140x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	165x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	86x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	69x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	201x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	135x
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 2,884 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16