Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 11:33
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 269
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 528
70% 522 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 126 124 124 115 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 342
Write 146
Mixed 191
SusWrite 119
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 38.8
151% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 128
104% 149 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 83%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
102GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 479 283 248 251 251 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 407
Write 476
Mixed 386
SusWrite 328
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 42.3
158% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 324
246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 196 185 194 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 151
Mixed 84
SusWrite 192
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
134GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 158 158 154 157 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 98
Write 55.5
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 156
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 112%
USB Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.4 6 6.4 6 6.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 9.7
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 6.2
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 8%
S31B0810 USB DISK 1GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.4 4.4 4 4.4 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.77% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.2
8% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
40% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
15GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 24
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 22
34% 27 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,206
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback