Samsung 550P5C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSamsung 550P5C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 16:42
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 185
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 475
55% 427 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 6.04
Parallax 3.16
4% 4.61 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.7
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 99 86 101 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 95.3
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CM0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback