Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P (all builds)
Memory	14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160119
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '18 at 07:08
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 147 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 458 45% 367 Pts	64-Core 461 28% 461 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Sapphire(174B E324) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.11.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.6% Very poor	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 61.6 Parallax 79.2 0% 47 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 55.7 Splatting 78 55% 65.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 1TB 536 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 304GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 107 96 102 109 111 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	65% Good	Read 121 Write 130 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 104 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.5 220% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 117%
Maxtor STM3500418AS 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 75GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 88 91 87 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 111 Write 105 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 87.8 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSXP 500GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 252GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 31 31 31 31 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 29.2 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 30.3 38% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 4,751 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

CPU
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	229x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	224x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	46x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	46x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	43x
BLS4G3D1609DS 2x4GBCrucialBench 43%, 4,102 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16