Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,838 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 145 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 587 56% 461 Pts	64-Core 804 50% 804 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200 1,717 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.9% Below average	Lighting 38.5 Reflection 40.1 Parallax 51.9 31% 43.5 fps	MRender 51.9 Gravity 34.3 Splatting 28 30% 38 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 141 172 176 210 423 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 312 Write 119 Mixed 190 SusWrite 207 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 24.6 97% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 119 112% 180 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 2.9 3.5 4.6 2.9 3.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	9.3% Terrible	Read 30.7 Write 4 Mixed 10 SusWrite 3.7 12% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.3 127% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.3% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G1A2 4x4GB 557 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 46.1 MC Write 39.2 MC Mixed 36.1 116% 40.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 19.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16