PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds) |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120914 |
Uptime | 14.8 Days |
Run Date | Nov 30 '18 at 14:23 |
Run Duration | 181 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 54 56 56 57 MB/s
|
60.3%
Good
|
|||
SSD 64GB 63GB
22GB free
Firmware: L0117A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 84 85 85 85 MB/s
|
24.3%
Poor
|
|||
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
50GB free
Firmware: R1311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 84 85 85 86 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
68GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
439GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 112 112 113 114 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 120x |
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples | 35x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $520 |