Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '18 at 21:27
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7740X-$281 5,094 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 273 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 767 73% 606 Pts	64-Core 766 47% 766 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Lighting 44.2 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 38.1 36% 37.7 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 41.9 Splatting 36.7 32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8,120 Write 10125 Mixed 9,262 2,060% 9,169 MB/s	4K Read 834 4K Write 693 4K Mixed 716 2,549% 748 MB/s	DQ Read 505 DQ Write 1,251 DQ Mixed 1,092 771% 949 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 1GB free Firmware: RVT21B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 508 Write 486 Mixed 459 108% 484 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 65.2 221% 78.4 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 287 225% 309 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 454GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 466 469 468 459 462 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60 7,916 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 164GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 35.8 Write 16 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 37.7 22% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 42%
WD Green 750GB (2009)-$224 5,100 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 381GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 66 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 64.2 Mixed 59 SusWrite 65.2 47% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 117GB free Firmware: JKAOA28A SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 79 78 78 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 97.7 Write 97.5 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 78 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 29.7 96% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 40 SC Mixed 29.7 83% 29.2 GB/s	Latency 53 75% 53 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	72x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	68x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	56x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	93x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	41x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $905

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16