PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Gigabyte Default string |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170607 |
Uptime | 3.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 06 '18 at 02:23 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
69.7%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 450 451 448 449 448 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
285GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 452 452 449 436 365 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
60.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 82x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 27x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 24x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 16x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $624 |