HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	4.6 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '18 at 12:22
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 146 58% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 275 34% 260 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B E206) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 2.13 2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 171 152 167 197 191 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 235 Write 84.5 Mixed 192 SusWrite 176 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 23.8 72% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 122 109% 163 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 464GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 136 137 137 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 132 Write 131 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 136 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 77%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 102GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 16 16 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 19.7 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 15.3 25% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 41%
ASMT 2115 1TB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 128GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 25.7 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 20.4 31% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 ID:04 43 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CK0 50GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.8% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 10.2 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 98.5 41% 98.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	488x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16