Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-V (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120215
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '18 at 15:21
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 150 57% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 446 37% 319 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 2.62 3% 3.35 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 7.65 4% 4.35 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.6% Above average	Lighting 67.1 Reflection 49.9 Parallax 59.1 55% 58.7 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 48.9 Splatting 61.8 49% 59.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 57 57 18 42 52 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.1% Poor	Read 167 Write 11.2 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 49.2 15% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 3.7 53% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 21 DQ Mixed 22.7 32% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 769GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 85.3 Write 96.3 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 90.9 63% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 119 120 118 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 129 Write 122 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 118 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	54x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $566

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16