PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L LE (all builds) |
Memory | 0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130522 |
Uptime | 3.7 Days |
Run Date | Dec 08 '18 at 11:33 |
Run Duration | 208 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gigabyte(1458 3604) 3GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 61 54 61 63 91 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
3GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 40 41 44 54 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
26GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 91 92 92 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
67GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 39 40 41 44 46 MB/s
|
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
73GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 68 68 70 68 MB/s
|
40.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 107C 5TB
366GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 34x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 27x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 19x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 9x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |