Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 1602M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 1602M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 1602M
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 25 '16 at 09:04
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 154
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 187
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7470
Sapphire(174B 8145) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.97
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 3.44
2% 3.08 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 2.22
2% 2.16 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV300 S37A 120G 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O112 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.5% Good
Read 265
Write 249
Mixed 254
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 32.6
104% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 83.8
90% 148 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 66%
WD WD10EZEX-22RKKA0 996GB
494GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 151
Write 91.4
Mixed 111
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.19
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.32
126% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 89%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB
0GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.64% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 3.69
Mixed 9.95
14% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.63
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 1.04
83% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-013.A00LF ACR512X64D3U16C11G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 1602M Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire 1602M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback