| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180309 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 16 '18 at 17:12 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.2%
Very good
|
77% 131 Pts
|
39% 291 Pts
|
18% 291 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.2
|
20.7%
Poor
|
20% 27.9 fps
|
23% 27.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 120GB-$67
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 413 398 411 285 296 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
88% 390 MB/s
|
156% 61.6 MB/s
|
109% 230 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
432GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 109 109 109 109 MB/s
|
61.6%
Good
|
65% 89.9 MB/s
|
121% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27
21GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 26 26 25 26 MB/s
|
94.7%
Outstanding
|
93% 89.4 MB/s
|
1,047% 14.3 MB/s
|
1,060% 14.4 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
33.8%
Below average
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
64% 62.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-HDS R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 108x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 56x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 36x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 43x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 35x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $237 |