Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HDS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '18 at 17:12
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-4170-$128
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.7% Above average
1-Core 101
2-Core 180
67% 141 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 288
39% 287 Pts
64-Core 290
20% 290 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 79.9
Parallax 93.1
19% 81.6 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 75.8
19% 67.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 120GB-$67
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 413 398 411 285 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 430
Mixed 324
SusWrite 371
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 39.1
156% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 38.8
109% 230 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
432GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 106
Write 110
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 109
65% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$13
21GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 26 26 25 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 31.9
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 26
93% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 11.5
1,047% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 18.1
DQ Mixed 11.6
1,060% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-HDS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback