Today's hottest deals

Fedora Virt-Manager

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFedora Virt-Manager  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BE0061MC
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '18 at 23:50
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 73
2-Core 106
59% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 200
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1325 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 84.4
55% 70 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 75.6
55% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 32GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 323
Write 316
Mixed 193
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 17.6
57% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 53.2
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 53.8
41% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 49%
Red Hat VirtIO 11GB
4GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 286
Write 322
Mixed 268
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 16.8
56% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 50.6
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 53.5
40% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 53%
Red Hat VirtIO 86GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 87.7
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
4% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 43GB
8GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 321
Write 360
Mixed 282
240% 321 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 17.4
2,984% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 51.9
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 52.7
486% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 89%
Red Hat VirtIO 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 124 122 120 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.7% Good
Read 122
Write 125
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 121
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
30GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,082
Write 1,212
Mixed 1,343
1,157% 1,545 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 29.7
5,361% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 78.6
DQ Write 48.7
DQ Mixed 41.6
447% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 19.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 14.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Virt-Manager Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Fedora Virt-Manager

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback