Tarox Basic PC 7000ZM

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Tarox Basic PC 7000ZM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z87M-PLUS
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '18 at 08:23
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 169 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 585 56% 464 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% XFX(1682 3220) 3GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 54.5 33% 41.4 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 36 28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 336GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 383 372 409 401 397 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 473 Mixed 374 SusWrite 396 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 58.1 197% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 246 208% 303 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 32GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 308 308 308 308 308 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 465 Write 464 Mixed 402 SusWrite 326 93% 414 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 58.9 205% 73.7 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 310 246% 342 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 129%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 6GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 65 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 67.7 Write 66.5 Mixed 42.7 SusWrite 57.4 43% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 660GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 142 138 149 150 149 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 150 Write 99.7 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 146 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-058.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5471-058.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.5% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 16.5 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 19.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16