Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 14:17
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 97.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 249
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 628
71% 555 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 56.4
37% 44.6 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 39.7
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1456 1413 1437 1464 1466 1382 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,001
Write 1,355
Mixed 948
SusWrite 1,436
320% 1,435 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 62.7
215% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 643
DQ Mixed 680
508% 676 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 264%
Great: 292%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$94
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 189 194 189 190 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 199
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 192
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.7
232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 113%
Great: 111%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$94
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 98 94 100 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 151
Write 156
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 96.9
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.6
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 25
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 46.4
86% 46.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback