Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Memory 47.9 1-Core 51.7 2-Core 167 47% 88.7 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 266 36% 268 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1085) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.7% Terrible	Lighting 6.93 Reflection 9.58 Parallax 6.22 6% 7.58 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 0.04 3% 3.96 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.7% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GB 337 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK10D7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 55 86 43 59 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 296 Write 114 Mixed 263 SusWrite 99 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 14.1 51% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 13.3 DQ Write 57.2 DQ Mixed 15.4 18% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/8G 1x8GB 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	73x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	63x

SSD
RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GBKingstonBench 61%, 337 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
SD9SB8W256G1014 256GBSandiskBench 79%, 135 samples	6x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 13,712 samples	16x
ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 2,224 samples	9x
AO1L16BC4R1-BUES 1x4GBAdataBench 22%, 645 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16