HP 550-154na

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP 550-154na (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B47
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150924
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '19 at 18:21
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 185 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 364 47% 356 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 36.9 31% 35.3 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 35.6 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GB 2,337 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 23 39 22 21 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 347 Write 33.2 Mixed 52 SusWrite 27.2 24% 115 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 15.1 52% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 38.6 DQ Mixed 48.3 72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 79%
Asmedia ASM1153E 250GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 139GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 267 288 286 270 262 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	53% Above average	Read 332 Write 299 Mixed 302 SusWrite 272 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 16.6 53% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 143 107% 142 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 363GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 129 127 131 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 154 Write 158 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 130 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 107%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB 3,542 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1.5TB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 112 Write 116 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 111 134% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56.3% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18.7 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16