Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '19 at 02:12
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 80.1 1-Core 125 2-Core 248 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 895 83% 692 Pts	64-Core 1,317 82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 148 Parallax 135 107% 138 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 130 Splatting 109 96% 118 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154 14,088 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 304GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 375 374 373 374 374 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 680 Write 649 Mixed 276 SusWrite 377 111% 496 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 91 4K Mixed 45.3 164% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 614 DQ Write 516 DQ Mixed 437 362% 523 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 155%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 292GB free Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1239 860 860 860 858 858 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	230% Outstanding	Read 1889 Write 1,882 Mixed 1,685 SusWrite 923 358% 1,595 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 63.2 217% 79.5 MB/s	DQ Read 802 DQ Write 566 DQ Mixed 746 540% 704 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 284%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$94 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 280GB free Firmware: 01.01M02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 114 108 109 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 109 Write 117 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 111 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 218% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 111%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$94 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01M02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 139 140 141 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 137 Write 140 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 140 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.7 230% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 111%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54 8,918 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 77GB free Firmware: 8104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 44 46 45 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 41.7 Write 48.5 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 44.4 31% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 50%
WD My Book 320GB 367 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 168GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 35 39 39 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 36.5 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 36.3 46% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 22%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 196GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 65 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 69.3 Write 63 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 64.1 84% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.2 44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2F4000C19 2x8GB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	88.7% Excellent	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 29.7 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.4 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 28.4 86% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16