MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 23:16
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 126
59% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 379
36% 301 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 977 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 57.4
Parallax 78.3
38% 60.7 fps
MRender 57
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 73.9
51% 60.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 14 15 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.7% Very poor
Read 193
Write 186
Mixed 184
SusWrite 14.4
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.8
13% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 118%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
344GB free
Firmware: UG45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 14 15 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.9% Very poor
Read 198
Write 144
Mixed 180
SusWrite 14.4
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.7
13% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
32GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 14 15 15 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 15.8
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 15.4
11% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
3GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 15 15 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.1% Terrible
Read 33.5
Write 26.3
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 14.9
22% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback