Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180925
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 16:07
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 1,102
98% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 42.4
32% 38.2 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 37.3
31% 38 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 147 156 185 171 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 367
Write 258
Mixed 260
SusWrite 158
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.1
162% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 201
159% 217 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
849GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 177 178 174 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 165
Mixed 104
SusWrite 175
118% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
556GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 148 148 148 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 143
Write 141
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 147
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 24.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 27.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback