Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '19 at 00:29
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 72 1-Core 68.3 2-Core 208 63% 116 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 722 69% 569 Pts	64-Core 940 58% 940 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.4% Above average	Lighting 62.5 Reflection 73.1 Parallax 89.3 51% 75 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 72.5 Splatting 59.6 55% 68.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 374 360 351 361 361 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 438 Write 417 Mixed 329 SusWrite 367 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 95.8 4K Mixed 49.3 168% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 304 228% 303 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 126%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 21GB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 101 98 102 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 149 Write 152 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 100 76% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 11GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 115 112 114 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 111 Write 118 Mixed 68 SusWrite 112 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 114%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 29GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 113 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 135 Write 130 Mixed 68 SusWrite 112 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 88%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 141 Write 76 Mixed 52 66% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D34AEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB 546 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 36 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 25.7 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 96.8 41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)