Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	109.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 10:15
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 741 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 69.4 1-Core 59.5 2-Core 137 52% 88.6 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 617 55% 466 Pts	64-Core 1,551 96% 1,551 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Palit(1569 1004) 3GB CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.5% Average	Lighting 55.1 Reflection 49.6 Parallax 64.4 45% 56.4 fps	MRender 66.1 Gravity 61 Splatting 48 47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 571GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 435 359 376 349 331 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 425 Write 394 Mixed 371 SusWrite 379 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 32.3 106% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 282 213% 286 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 167GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 238 236 239 239 233 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58% Above average	Read 240 Write 222 Mixed 217 SusWrite 237 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 26.1 85% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 164 123% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 134%
WDC WDS2 00T2B0A-00SM50 2TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 102 101 101 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.1% Poor	Read 281 Write 98.8 Mixed 135 SusWrite 101 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 8.8 39% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 104%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB 1,735 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 133 Write 134 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 95.4 144% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 38.5 MC Mixed 33 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.8 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R920 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	5x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	2x
Trion 150 480GBOCZ $300Bench 85%, 13,412 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351U7CFR8A 16x4GBHynixBench 84%, 5 samples	4x
HMT351U7CFR8A 8x4GBHynixBench 85%, 11 samples	2x
36KSF1G72PZ-1 8x8GBMicronBench 89%, 49 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16