TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '19 at 12:51
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 150
67% 108 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 491
46% 381 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 72.7%
 Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1423 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 101
59% 82 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 61.8
56% 69.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 58.1%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 190 193 185 227 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 492
Write 321
Mixed 421
SusWrite 206
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 48.5
155% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 43
DQ Mixed 2.4
34% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 86.6%
 Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 38 38 39 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1808
Write 4
SusWrite 37.4
440% 616 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
2,244% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
424GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 115 117 111 115 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 53.1
Write 58.2
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 114
45% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 47.8%
 Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
256GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 64 67 66 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43% Average
Read 84
Write 61.4
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 65.4
54% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 43%
 Great: 67%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
613GB free, PID 61b7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 79 78 80 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 75.8
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 79.3
98% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 38.9%
 Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 21.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 14.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 55.9
72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 58.2%
 Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD  $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples431x
FX-6300AMD  $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples112x
FX-8370AMD  $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples85x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples66x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples51x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples22x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples18x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback