Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '19 at 18:34
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 72.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 222 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 910 80% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,252 78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 110 Parallax 94.6 87% 104 fps	MRender 96.8 Gravity 96.3 Splatting 98.1 80% 97 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB 4,257 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0422C Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 449 Write 421 Mixed 371 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 35.9 125% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 232 201% 295 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 74GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 102 117 118 119 118 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 78.5 Write 70.5 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 115 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 234GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 152 154 154 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 161 Write 162 Mixed 31 SusWrite 152 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 3x8GB 347 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	MC Read 41.2 MC Write 36.6 MC Mixed 30.9 104% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 28 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 96 42% 96 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16