Asrock N68C-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100622
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 17:51
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 84.8
41% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 171
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
MSI(1462 2200) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 6.16
6% 7.55 fps
MRender 8.38
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 9.26
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 35 52 49 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.3% Very poor
Read 134
Write 35.5
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 59.1
15% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 7.2
32% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 12.6
9% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 127 128 130 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 54
SusWrite 128
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Intenso Ultra Line 32GB
17GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 15.4
Mixed 15.1
SusWrite 13.4
20% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 24%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Read 8.4
Write 8
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 7.7
11% 7.85 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.2
74% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback