PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A32 |
Motherboard | MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds) |
Memory | 28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190121 |
Uptime | 3.4 Days |
Run Date | Feb 27 '19 at 20:25 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
86.5%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 523 534 543 535 523 377 MB/s
|
200%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
29GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 106 92 97 87 84 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
230GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 109 111 111 112 112 MB/s
|
58.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown IM4AGU88A30-FGGHMB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 250x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 225x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 174x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 121x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 115x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $918 |