HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8217
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 182
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 265
33% 251 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8217) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 5
5% 12 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 14
7% 8.41 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000H1 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 95 110 113 87 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 322
Write 364
Mixed 265
SusWrite 88.6
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 17.5
77% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 92.8
DQ Mixed 93.8
98% 169 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
701GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 58 54 50 72 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 79.3
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 53.2
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 75%
Integral Courier 16GB
5GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 11 14 13 14 8.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 10
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 11.3
15% 9.37 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 11%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
538GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 39 38 39 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 34.1
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 37.6
46% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback