PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180705 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 14 '19 at 12:47 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 88% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 219 214 210 206 210 MB/s
|
69%
Good
|
|||
Intel Optane+1.8TBHDD
1.5TB free
Firmware: 16.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 113 116 111 130 137 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
54.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $198Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 344x |
Core i5-8600KIntel $198Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 123x |
Core i7-8700Intel $193Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 67x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 73x |
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples | 57x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 53x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $880 |