HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190130
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '19 at 15:45
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	60%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 218 74% 134 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 615 63% 509 Pts	64-Core 966 60% 966 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.7% Good	Lighting 80.6 Reflection 95.7 Parallax 76 66% 84.1 fps	MRender 80.8 Gravity 77.9 Splatting 81.5 66% 80.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 164 162 164 165 158 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	157% Outstanding	Read 1,399 Write 736 Mixed 522 SusWrite 178 156% 709 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 51.9 174% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 880 DQ Write 748 DQ Mixed 700 556% 776 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 317%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 858GB free Firmware: HPH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 182 192 194 197 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 178 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 192 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB 6,220 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 19.9 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 12 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,238x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	719x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	588x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	736x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	357x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	290x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	353x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	172x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	157x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	395x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	220x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	179x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16