Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3160 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	30.6% Below average	Memory 46.3 1-Core 22.4 2-Core 44.8 26% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 87 8-Core 89.1 12% 88.1 Pts	64-Core 85 5% 85 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 38CC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 2.53 1% 2.22 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 3.04 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3G 128GB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 101 94 99 100 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 272 Write 320 Mixed 296 SusWrite 106 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 20.5 68% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 155 113% 148 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x2GB 580 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 6.4 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 11%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	16x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	1x
Celeron N3160IntelBench 28%, 1,747 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	18x

SSD
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	3x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	3x
MZNTY256HDHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 1,991 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16