Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 47.5 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 31.8 23% 32.1 Pts	4-Core 34.4 8-Core 32.5 4% 33.5 Pts	64-Core 32.6 2% 32.6 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 2108) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.88% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.88% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1226B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 150 282 117 62 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 231 Write 286 Mixed 236 SusWrite 154 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 11.6 39% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 67.8 DQ Write 66.7 DQ Mixed 39.8 38% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 667, 800 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 5.2 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	11x
E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 25%, 3,595 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 512GBIntensoBench 76%, 514 samples	1x
Pyro 120GBPatriot $73Bench 63%, 135 samples	1x
XF1230-1A0480 480GBBench 90%, 35 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	2x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x
RMT3020EF48E8W1333 2x2GBRamaxelBench 30%, 858 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16