Asus Rampage II Extreme

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage II Extreme (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110919
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '19 at 20:05
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 96 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 175 72% 119 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 538 54% 442 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 37.9 32% 36.1 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 37 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 240GB 5,900 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 89GB free Firmware: SBFA10.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 61 62 60 57 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.4% Below average	Read 202 Write 76.5 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 59.9 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 20.3 80% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 34 DQ Mixed 24.1 20% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 91%
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 139GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 228 Write 31.5 Mixed 201 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 50.2 4K Mixed 28.1 98% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 80.2 DQ Mixed 36.5 33% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 93%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 196 196 204 203 202 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.6% Above average	Read 174 Write 210 Mixed 184 SusWrite 202 44% 192 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 29.5 96% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 33.3 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 42.1 33% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 124%
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 223GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 62 60 56 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.3% Average	Read 231 Write 225 Mixed 190 SusWrite 59.9 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 27.7 96% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 78.6 DQ Mixed 36.6 33% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 93%
USB 3.0 6TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 30 31 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 32.5 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 30.7 23% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.5% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.6 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 11.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 53.9 74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage II Extreme Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	176x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	46x
Core i7 975Intel $550Bench 72%, 3,143 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	30x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	109x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	83x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $316

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16