Asrock Z170 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 18:37
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 99.2
1-Core 165
2-Core 331
108% 198 Pts
4-Core 655
8-Core 670
88% 662 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 204
Parallax 187
160% 196 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 194
Splatting 129
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 138%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 734 754 747 760 760 755 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,116
Write 757
Mixed 781
SusWrite 752
242% 1,102 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 73.6
296% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,527
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 872
710% 1,033 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 270%
Great: 273%
Intel SSDSC2KW360H6 360GB
335GB free
Firmware: LSB042C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 246 91 96 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 494
Write 153
Mixed 104
SusWrite 159
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 32.7
125% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 68.9
108% 206 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
887GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 159 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 154
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 160
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
466GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 102 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 87.6
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 101
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
182GB free
Firmware: CT10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 50 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 71.8
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 50.9
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34%
Great: 42%
WD WD2500YS-01SHB1 251GB
234GB free
Firmware: 20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 56.6
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 57.2
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3318 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 32.6
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 35.3
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 40.1
100% 40.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 114%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 OC Formula Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,248
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback