Medion ERAZER X5315 G/C208

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X5315 G/C208 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160304
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '19 at 19:52
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 104 2-Core 204 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 582 59% 481 Pts	64-Core 605 37% 605 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 56.3 Reflection 56.3 Parallax 47.6 46% 53.4 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 55.5 Splatting 48.7 46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 54%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Elitegroup(1019 9C32) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.94% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 9.19 Parallax 6.22 5% 7.21 fps	MRender 7.52 Gravity 5.73 Splatting 13 8% 8.75 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.94% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GB 2,168 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 68 74 72 67 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 271 Mixed 282 SusWrite 86.6 61% 277 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 49.5 172% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 309 239% 327 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 109%
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 150 150 151 152 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 153 Write 148 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 150 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 8,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.3% Good	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.2 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 17.4 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5315 G/C208 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

System: Medion ERAZER X5315 G/C208

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x

SSD
MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 87%, 2,168 samples	2x
Ultra 3D 250GBSanDisk $50Bench 85%, 5,775 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	1x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 86%, 13,446 samples	1x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16