Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 151
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 370
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 3628) 3GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 91.2
58% 77 fps
MRender 81.6
Gravity 81.6
Splatting 52.3
57% 71.8 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 236 227 231 193 250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 291
Write 218
Mixed 282
SusWrite 237
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 34.1
78% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 261
198% 267 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
366GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 405 419 421 390 394 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 399
Write 456
Mixed 389
SusWrite 402
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 47.5
154% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 273
203% 269 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
613GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 499 508 520 499 509 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 24.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $879
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback