| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20121009 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 16 '19 at 09:12 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.3%
Above average
|
47% 72.3 Pts
|
26% 203 Pts
|
15% 244 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
|
35.4%
Below average
|
37% 38.7 fps
|
32% 39 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
55% 250 MB/s
|
105% 34.4 MB/s
|
42% 59.5 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
36GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 121 131 134 132 132 MB/s
|
61.7%
Good
|
63% 84.8 MB/s
|
108% 0.7 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
61GB free
Firmware: 01.00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 94 94 102 101 120 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
78% 106 MB/s
|
211% 1.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600 C8 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29%
Poor
|
28% 9.87 GB/s
|
18% 6.4 GB/s
|
49% 81.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 120x |
| Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples | 34x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 31x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $520 |