Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180208
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '19 at 21:23
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AZE-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 85 2-Core 133 56% 94.9 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 278 33% 253 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.1% Poor	Lighting 34.1 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 27 28% 29.6 fps	MRender 36.4 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 33.6 29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 45 35 50 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 303 Write 112 Mixed 104 SusWrite 51.4 31% 143 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 10.9 57% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 27.9 51% 102 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 334GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 142 143 143 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 156 Write 157 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 140 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 113%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 7GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Read 8.8 Write 4.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.5 7% 5.82 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 23% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1B1 1x8GB 633 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.6 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	11x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	12x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $443

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16