Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 10:45
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 270
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 697
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 76
Parallax 65.6
60% 71.7 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 69.5
57% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 244 204 222 234 232 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 402
Write 462
Mixed 370
SusWrite 227
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 38.7
142% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 325
246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 99%
OCZ AGILITY3 480GB
168GB free
Firmware: 2.28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 116 159 166 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 213
Write 128
Mixed 117
SusWrite 138
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 18
63% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 60.3
51% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 41%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 103 102 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 99.7
Mixed 71
SusWrite 102
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 167 166 165 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 130
Mixed 78
SusWrite 165
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 113%
ChipBank SD/MM Reader 128GB
119GB free, PID 1307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 7.5 7.4 7.6 7.5 7.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 11.5
Write 11.3
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 7.9
15% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.4
235% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $684
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback