Lenovo 429046M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 429046M  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 429046M
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '19 at 02:32
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 113
54% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 147
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.56
2% 2.29 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 4.22
2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 350 362 364 378 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 445
Write 320
Mixed 328
SusWrite 358
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 22
88% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 223
173% 238 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback