Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 01 '19 at 23:08
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 122 2-Core 257 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 805 81% 658 Pts	64-Core 1,026 64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B8) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.7% Above average	Lighting 63.9 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 56.1 52% 61.6 fps	MRender 68.4 Gravity 63 Splatting 66.3 54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1438 398 399 400 400 401 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,387 Write 2,209 Mixed 1,442 SusWrite 573 369% 1,653 MB/s	4K Read 59.1 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 81.9 283% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,012 DQ Write 1,172 DQ Mixed 1,164 857% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 302%
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82 4,735 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 72GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 274 217 214 198 204 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 401 Write 373 Mixed 294 SusWrite 248 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 36.3 144% 56.8 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 248 206% 296 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 98%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75 15,430 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 94GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 437 Write 39.3 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 38.4 31% 147 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 26.3 95% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 38 DQ Mixed 64.1 67% 116 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 77%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 828GB free Firmware: MEAOA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 74 81 77 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 73.7 Write 71.3 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 75.3 49% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 66%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 794GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 127 129 129 129 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 132 Write 46.5 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 124 69% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 75%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 800 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 152GB free, PID a20c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 3.5 Write 95 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 103 94% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D32BEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB 664 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.6% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 15.2 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 16.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 57.1 70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,513x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	833x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	573x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	401x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	339x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16