Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 03 '19 at 06:22
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 136
57% 95 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 489
44% 370 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 31.1
9% 18.2 fps
MRender 47.3
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 43.2
34% 41.2 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 217 206 200 197 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 992
Write 600
Mixed 374
SusWrite 252
122% 555 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 27.7
94% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 562
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 450
336% 451 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 104%
Great: 254%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100
978GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 299 284 349 452 456 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 260
Write 296
Mixed 261
SusWrite 356
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 20.5
72% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 324
246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 105%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
171GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 85 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 112
Write 71
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 85.7
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 40.3
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $891
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback