User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP
MotherboardHP 84EE
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 04:50
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400T-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 77
2-Core 155
51% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 571
47% 407 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 84EE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 6.34
5% 7.48 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 13.7
7% 7.59 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+931GBHDD 1TB
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 72 75 77 39 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 547
Write 118
Mixed 219
SusWrite 63.7
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 45.5
164% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 252
182% 239 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 1.1
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback