User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AB1
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111228
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	May 05 '19 at 23:08
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 960T-$469 4,461 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 82 1-Core 44.3 2-Core 87.5 47% 71.3 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 132 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PNY(196E 1119) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.16% Terrible	Lighting 6.27 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 7.78 5% 7 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 7.17 5% 6.26 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.16% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 841GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 33 24 33 30 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 42 Mixed 42 SusWrite 29.5 28% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 464GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 35 25 34 31 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 60.2 Write 61.5 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 30.5 38% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 57%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 2TB 1,143 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 186GB free, PID 50a5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.2 9.3 9.2 9.3 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	7.66% Terrible	Read 20.3 Write 18.5 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 9.4 22% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.66% Great: 60%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 2TB 1,143 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 163GB free, PID 50a5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 9.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.67% Terrible	Read 18.2 Write 5.5 Mixed 8.8 SusWrite 8.7 12% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 20% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.67% Great: 60%
Seagate FreeAgent 500GB 796 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 177GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.2 9.3 9.2 9.3 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.21% Terrible	Read 15 Write 9.5 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 9.4 15% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.21% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.5% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 12.6 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 9.1 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)