Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 120 55% 88.6 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 148 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21FB) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 3 3% 4.19 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 8.22 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,859 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM01D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 206 201 209 217 212 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 326 Write 222 Mixed 208 SusWrite 205 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 17.2 59% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 131 138% 230 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8 9,864 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 25GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 124 Write 86 Mixed 97 125% 102 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 3.4 237% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GB 4,855 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.6 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16