Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '19 at 21:24
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 189 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 612 60% 490 Pts	64-Core 1,066 66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.9% Very good	Lighting 97.1 Reflection 110 Parallax 91.8 79% 99.7 fps	MRender 95.6 Gravity 92.3 Splatting 98.4 78% 95.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1032 1035 833 812 805 797 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,303 Write 1,063 Mixed 1,082 SusWrite 886 243% 1,083 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 73.3 237% 79.9 MB/s	DQ Read 804 DQ Write 754 DQ Mixed 785 588% 781 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 232GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 298 297 297 297 299 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 481 Mixed 407 SusWrite 317 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 57.2 193% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 370 278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 124%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 718GB free Firmware: JP4ONA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 104 104 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 114 Write 104 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 104 70% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 75%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 3 4.3 3.4 3.4 4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 13 Write 0.5 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 3.4 5% 5.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 29.4 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 19.1 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	80x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	60x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $971

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)